According to this story in the Huffington Post, Sarah Palin has been invited to testify before the NY Senate on Elderly Care, Death Panels.
Unless I am mistaken, Mrs. Palin has no expertise in the field of Hospice counseling, nor has she claimed any direct connection to or experience with it? What lies behind her interest in Advanced Care Planning Consultation, and what has compelled her to refer to those who provide it to others as "death panels?" I do have personal experience with hospice and with end of life counseling. My experience was uplifting and life affirming, not life denying. I am dumbfounded that people such Mr. Huckabee, our former governor, and others have have chosen to diminish, and outright discredit the positive contributions these programs have made to society. While no expert on the subject of medicine, I have professional experience reading and interpreting government regulations: federal and state workers' compensation, fisheries management, Occupational Health and Safety (OSHA), Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Alaska Statutes (AS), and my personal favorite, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). I have read the section in H.R. 3200, and cannot see the connection between what has been provided for in section 1233, HR 3200 amending section 1861 of the Social Security Act and the establishment of "death panels."
Below is the full text of section 1233, page 424, of House Resolution 3200:
H.R.3200
America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 (Introduced in House)
SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION.
(a) Medicare-
(1) IN GENERAL- Section 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x) is amended--
(A) in subsection (s)(2)--
(i) by striking `and' at the end of subparagraph (DD);
(ii) by adding `and' at the end of subparagraph (EE); and
(iii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
`(FF) advance care planning consultation (as defined in subsection (hhh)(1));'; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
`Advance Care Planning Consultation
`(hhh)(1) Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), the term `advance care planning consultation' means a consultation between the individual and a practitioner described in paragraph (2) regarding advance care planning, if, subject to paragraph (3), the individual involved has not had such a consultation within the last 5 years. Such consultation shall include the following:
`(A) An explanation by the practitioner of advance care planning, including key questions and considerations, important steps, and suggested people to talk to.
`(B) An explanation by the practitioner of advance directives, including living wills and durable powers of attorney, and their uses.
`(C) An explanation by the practitioner of the role and responsibilities of a health care proxy.
`(D) The provision by the practitioner of a list of national and State-specific resources to assist consumers and their families with advance care planning, including the national toll-free hotline, the advance care planning clearinghouses, and State legal service organizations (including those funded through the Older Americans Act of 1965).
`(E) An explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits for such services and supports that are available under this title.
`(F)(i) Subject to clause (ii), an explanation of orders regarding life sustaining treatment or similar orders, which shall include--
`(I) the reasons why the development of such an order is beneficial to the individual and the individual's family and the reasons why such an order should be updated periodically as the health of the individual changes;
`(II) the information needed for an individual or legal surrogate to make informed decisions regarding the completion of such an order; and
`(III) the identification of resources that an individual may use to determine the requirements of the State in which such individual resides so that the treatment wishes of that individual will be carried out if the individual is unable to communicate those wishes, including requirements regarding the designation of a surrogate decision maker (also known as a health care proxy).
`(ii) The Secretary shall limit the requirement for explanations under clause (i) to consultations furnished in a State--
`(I) in which all legal barriers have been addressed for enabling orders for life sustaining treatment to constitute a set of medical orders respected across all care settings; and
`(II) that has in effect a program for orders for life sustaining treatment described in clause (iii).
`(iii) A program for orders for life sustaining treatment for a States described in this clause is a program that--
`(I) ensures such orders are standardized and uniquely identifiable throughout the State;
`(II) distributes or makes accessible such orders to physicians and other health professionals that (acting within the scope of the professional's authority under State law) may sign orders for life sustaining treatment;
`(III) provides training for health care professionals across the continuum of care about the goals and use of orders for life sustaining treatment; and
`(IV) is guided by a coalition of stakeholders includes representatives from emergency medical services, emergency department physicians or nurses, state long-term care association, state medical association, state surveyors, agency responsible for senior services, state department of health, state hospital association, home health association, state bar association, and state hospice association.
`(2) A practitioner described in this paragraph is--
`(A) a physician (as defined in subsection (r)(1)); and
`(B) a nurse practitioner or physician's assistant who has the authority under State law to sign orders for life sustaining treatments.
`(3)(A) An initial preventive physical examination under subsection (WW), including any related discussion during such examination, shall not be considered an advance care planning consultation for purposes of applying the 5-year limitation under paragraph (1).
`(B) An advance care planning consultation with respect to an individual may be conducted more frequently than provided under paragraph (1) if there is a significant change in the health condition of the individual, including diagnosis of a chronic, progressive, life-limiting disease, a life-threatening or terminal diagnosis or life-threatening injury, or upon admission to a skilled nursing facility, a long-term care facility (as defined by the Secretary), or a hospice program.
`(4) A consultation under this subsection may include the formulation of an order regarding life sustaining treatment or a similar order.
`(5)(A) For purposes of this section, the term `order regarding life sustaining treatment' means, with respect to an individual, an actionable medical order relating to the treatment of that individual that--
`(i) is signed and dated by a physician (as defined in subsection (r)(1)) or another health care professional (as specified by the Secretary and who is acting within the scope of the professional's authority under State law in signing such an order, including a nurse practitioner or physician assistant) and is in a form that permits it to stay with the individual and be followed by health care professionals and providers across the continuum of care;
`(ii) effectively communicates the individual's preferences regarding life sustaining treatment, including an indication of the treatment and care desired by the individual;
`(iii) is uniquely identifiable and standardized within a given locality, region, or State (as identified by the Secretary); and
`(iv) may incorporate any advance directive (as defined in section 1866(f)(3)) if executed by the individual.
`(B) The level of treatment indicated under subparagraph (A)(ii) may range from an indication for full treatment to an indication to limit some or all or specified interventions. Such indicated levels of treatment may include indications respecting, among other items--
`(i) the intensity of medical intervention if the patient is pulse less, apneic, or has serious cardiac or pulmonary problems;
`(ii) the individual's desire regarding transfer to a hospital or remaining at the current care setting;
`(iii) the use of antibiotics; and
`(iv) the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration.'.
(2) PAYMENT- Section 1848(j)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting `(2)(FF),' after `(2)(EE),'.
(3) FREQUENCY LIMITATION- Section 1862(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)) is amended--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) in subparagraph (N), by striking `and' at the end;
(ii) in subparagraph (O) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting `, and'; and
(iii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
`(P) in the case of advance care planning consultations (as defined in section 1861(hhh)(1)), which are performed more frequently than is covered under such section;'; and
(B) in paragraph (7), by striking `or (K)' and inserting `(K), or (P)'.
(4) EFFECTIVE DATE- The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to consultations furnished on or after January 1, 2011.
(b) Expansion of Physician Quality Reporting Initiative for End of Life Care-
(1) Physician'S QUALITY REPORTING INITIATIVE- Section 1848(k)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(k)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
`(3) Physician'S QUALITY REPORTING INITIATIVE-
`(A) IN GENERAL- For purposes of reporting data on quality measures for covered professional services furnished during 2011 and any subsequent year, to the extent that measures are available, the Secretary shall include quality measures on end of life care and advanced care planning that have been adopted or endorsed by a consensus-based organization, if appropriate. Such measures shall measure both the creation of and adherence to orders for life-sustaining treatment.
`(B) PROPOSED SET OF MEASURES- The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register proposed quality measures on end of life care and advanced care planning that the Secretary determines are described in subparagraph (A) and would be appropriate for eligible professionals to use to submit data to the Secretary. The Secretary shall provide for a period of public comment on such set of measures before finalizing such proposed measures.'.
(c) Inclusion of Information in Medicare & You Handbook-
(1) MEDICARE & YOU HANDBOOK-
(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall update the online version of the Medicare & You Handbook to include the following:
(i) An explanation of advance care planning and advance directives, including--
(I) living wills;
(II) durable power of attorney;
(III) orders of life-sustaining treatment; and
(IV) health care proxies.
(ii) A description of Federal and State resources available to assist individuals and their families with advance care planning and advance directives, including--
(I) available State legal service organizations to assist individuals with advance care planning, including those organizations that receive funding pursuant to the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 93001 et seq.);
(II) website links or addresses for State-specific advance directive forms; and
(III) any additional information, as determined by the Secretary.
(B) UPDATE OF PAPER AND SUBSEQUENT VERSIONS- The Secretary shall include the information described in subparagraph (A) in all paper and electronic versions of the Medicare & You Handbook that are published on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
The links that have been inserted into the language of the section of HR 3200 above are mine, and are not included in the original text of the legislation. I have done so to allow people to explore the definitions of certain terms, to provide links to examples of some of the organizations referred to in the section, or to other acts impacted by this section of proposed legislation. Because Mrs. Palin will be speaking in New York, the link for "health care proxy" is provided by New York's Department of Health. Similar definitions applicable to Alaskans can be found under the Department of Health.
Those in opposition to section 1233 of HR 3200 must not fully understand, or simply fail to acknowledge what is obvious in subsection (B).
`(B) The level of treatment indicated under subparagraph (A)(ii) may range from an indication for full treatment to an indication to limit some or all or specified interventions. Such indicated levels of treatment may include indications respecting, among other items--
I have read the tweets, the letters to editors, watched the videos, heard the speeches of those in opposition to HR 3200. I have heard them make the outrageous accusation that section 1233 of HR 3200 is an attempt by Obama and the progressive Democrats to cut medicare spending by directing our elderly to end their lives prematurely. I denounce these people, and refute their claims based not only on my personal experience, but on the language of this bill and the Social Security Act it seeks to amend.
The sole purpose of these accusations is to derail any attempt by governemnt to impose long overdue regulations the practics of the for profit, health insurance industry. If Mrs. Palin has another reason for taking her position on this issue, she needs to quickly clarify those reasons. If she cannot, then I suggest she find another way to capitalize on her notoriety. If her intent is to use this issue for her personal gain, then progressive Alaskans must actively denounce her efforts. The issue of Advanced Care Consultation affects thousands of Americans every year in every city in every walk of life. Hospice has done so much good for so very many, and we owe it to those who provide such services, and even to those who choose to fight for life to the bitter end, to keep the cult of personality off the table, and politics for personal gain out of the discussion.
I encourage those with a personal stake or interest in this matter, to contact your state and federal Congressmen and women, local newspapers, local assembly persons and share your stories and your opinions. And, because our former governor has chosen to speak in New York, I would recomned contacting the NY Senate. I normally do advocate interfering in the legislative affairs of another state, but as goes Sarah so go her former constituents. Think of ourselves as character references not in favor of her character. We cannot let the voices of the one or the few outweigh the concerns and the needs of the many. "Start spreading the news."
`(5)(A) For purposes of this section, the term `order regarding life sustaining treatment' means, with respect to an individual, an actionable medical order relating to the treatment of that individual that--
`(i) is signed and dated by a physician (as defined in subsection (r)(1)) or another health care professional (as specified by the Secretary and who is acting within the scope of the professional's authority under State law in signing such an order, including a nurse practitioner or physician assistant) and is in a form that permits it to stay with the individual and be followed by health care professionals and providers across the continuum of care;
`(ii) effectively communicates the individual's preferences regarding life sustaining treatment, including an indication of the treatment and care desired by the individual;
`(iii) is uniquely identifiable and standardized within a given locality, region, or State (as identified by the Secretary); and
`(iv) may incorporate any advance directive (as defined in section 1866(f)(3)) if executed by the individual.
`(B) The level of treatment indicated under subparagraph (A)(ii) may range from an indication for full treatment to an indication to limit some or all or specified interventions. Such indicated levels of treatment may include indications respecting, among other items--
`(i) the intensity of medical intervention if the patient is pulse less, apneic, or has serious cardiac or pulmonary problems;
`(ii) the individual's desire regarding transfer to a hospital or remaining at the current care setting;
`(iii) the use of antibiotics; and
`(iv) the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration.'.
(2) PAYMENT- Section 1848(j)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting `(2)(FF),' after `(2)(EE),'.
(3) FREQUENCY LIMITATION- Section 1862(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)) is amended--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) in subparagraph (N), by striking `and' at the end;
(ii) in subparagraph (O) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting `, and'; and
(iii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
`(P) in the case of advance care planning consultations (as defined in section 1861(hhh)(1)), which are performed more frequently than is covered under such section;'; and
(B) in paragraph (7), by striking `or (K)' and inserting `(K), or (P)'.
(4) EFFECTIVE DATE- The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to consultations furnished on or after January 1, 2011.
(b) Expansion of Physician Quality Reporting Initiative for End of Life Care-
(1) Physician'S QUALITY REPORTING INITIATIVE- Section 1848(k)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(k)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
`(3) Physician'S QUALITY REPORTING INITIATIVE-
`(A) IN GENERAL- For purposes of reporting data on quality measures for covered professional services furnished during 2011 and any subsequent year, to the extent that measures are available, the Secretary shall include quality measures on end of life care and advanced care planning that have been adopted or endorsed by a consensus-based organization, if appropriate. Such measures shall measure both the creation of and adherence to orders for life-sustaining treatment.
`(B) PROPOSED SET OF MEASURES- The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register proposed quality measures on end of life care and advanced care planning that the Secretary determines are described in subparagraph (A) and would be appropriate for eligible professionals to use to submit data to the Secretary. The Secretary shall provide for a period of public comment on such set of measures before finalizing such proposed measures.'.
(c) Inclusion of Information in Medicare & You Handbook-
(1) MEDICARE & YOU HANDBOOK-
(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall update the online version of the Medicare & You Handbook to include the following:
(i) An explanation of advance care planning and advance directives, including--
(I) living wills;
(II) durable power of attorney;
(III) orders of life-sustaining treatment; and
(IV) health care proxies.
(ii) A description of Federal and State resources available to assist individuals and their families with advance care planning and advance directives, including--
(I) available State legal service organizations to assist individuals with advance care planning, including those organizations that receive funding pursuant to the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 93001 et seq.);
(II) website links or addresses for State-specific advance directive forms; and
(III) any additional information, as determined by the Secretary.
(B) UPDATE OF PAPER AND SUBSEQUENT VERSIONS- The Secretary shall include the information described in subparagraph (A) in all paper and electronic versions of the Medicare & You Handbook that are published on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
The links that have been inserted into the language of the section of HR 3200 above are mine, and are not included in the original text of the legislation. I have done so to allow people to explore the definitions of certain terms, to provide links to examples of some of the organizations referred to in the section, or to other acts impacted by this section of proposed legislation. Because Mrs. Palin will be speaking in New York, the link for "health care proxy" is provided by New York's Department of Health. Similar definitions applicable to Alaskans can be found under the Department of Health.
Those in opposition to section 1233 of HR 3200 must not fully understand, or simply fail to acknowledge what is obvious in subsection (B).
`(B) The level of treatment indicated under subparagraph (A)(ii) may range from an indication for full treatment to an indication to limit some or all or specified interventions. Such indicated levels of treatment may include indications respecting, among other items--
Clearly, this statement allows patients to choose to extend their lives, as well as, to chose to not extend their lives through artificial means. No where in section 1233 is it suggested that patients chose to end their lives prematurely. In addition, the following sub section would indicate that the patient has the option of increasing the frequency of counseling as the condition of their health changes.
`(B) An advance care planning consultation with respect to an individual may be conducted more frequently than provided under paragraph (1) if there is a significant change in the health condition of the individual, including diagnosis of a chronic, progressive, life-limiting disease, a life-threatening or terminal diagnosis or life-threatening injury, or upon admission to a skilled nursing facility, a long-term care facility (as defined by the Secretary), or a hospice program.
Section 1233 of HR 3200 does not create provisions for the creation of death panels. It does not force doctors recommend to their elderly patients that they opt for euthansia. It does not force hospitals to pull plugs, shut off IVs or refuse other life sustaining treatments so long as it does not conflict with the wishes of the patient. Moreover, end of life counseling enables the patient to clearly set forth those wishes to his medical provider and family members in the form of a legally recognized living will which can be updated at any time as the health of the patient changes. I have read the tweets, the letters to editors, watched the videos, heard the speeches of those in opposition to HR 3200. I have heard them make the outrageous accusation that section 1233 of HR 3200 is an attempt by Obama and the progressive Democrats to cut medicare spending by directing our elderly to end their lives prematurely. I denounce these people, and refute their claims based not only on my personal experience, but on the language of this bill and the Social Security Act it seeks to amend.
The sole purpose of these accusations is to derail any attempt by governemnt to impose long overdue regulations the practics of the for profit, health insurance industry. If Mrs. Palin has another reason for taking her position on this issue, she needs to quickly clarify those reasons. If she cannot, then I suggest she find another way to capitalize on her notoriety. If her intent is to use this issue for her personal gain, then progressive Alaskans must actively denounce her efforts. The issue of Advanced Care Consultation affects thousands of Americans every year in every city in every walk of life. Hospice has done so much good for so very many, and we owe it to those who provide such services, and even to those who choose to fight for life to the bitter end, to keep the cult of personality off the table, and politics for personal gain out of the discussion.
I encourage those with a personal stake or interest in this matter, to contact your state and federal Congressmen and women, local newspapers, local assembly persons and share your stories and your opinions. And, because our former governor has chosen to speak in New York, I would recomned contacting the NY Senate. I normally do advocate interfering in the legislative affairs of another state, but as goes Sarah so go her former constituents. Think of ourselves as character references not in favor of her character. We cannot let the voices of the one or the few outweigh the concerns and the needs of the many. "Start spreading the news."
1 comments:
Clearly, Sarah Palin is using the made up (that is to say, lying) "death panels" for her own political gain. There are no death panels in this legislation--it is an attempt to insure that seriously ill people get a chance to discuss ALL their options with their doctor.
Before Palin was in the national spotlight, she signed a proclamation declaring a day promoting exactly these kinds of voluntary consulations. I am a hospice patient myself, and benefited greatly from open discussions with my doctors after which I chose hospice as my best option. I blog on my hospice experience at judi-lifeasahospicepatient.blogspot.com
Post a Comment
Please, no foul language, and be constructive with your thoughts.